Direction for Your Business
Copyright ©2007-
The consulting services of Strategy Sanity are multi-
Site tends to look best using Internet Explorer, but Firefox is a favorite as well.
Regarding the article:
China mulls national CPU architecture spec
by Rick Merritt
found on EETimes (A UBM Company) 4/23/2012
www.eetimes.com/electronics-
Feedback from the analysts at Strategy Sanity follows...
Some important things to remember:
China is a centralized government society. It has been forever. Free independent thought and marching to your own beat "isn't encouraged." So if the word goes out, "you will design with CNP (China Nationalist Processor)" then one guesses there will not be a lot of wandering designs.
Given the chance to use an existing microprocessor instruction set architecture (ISA),
including an on-
I don't get the feeling China (if we can speak of the country as one unified mass with a single purpose) is interested in picking the best existing architecture and ecosystem. It feels a lot to me more like they're wanting to take their massive human capital and applying it to designing a new processor architecture that might take advantage of all the latest and current concepts in processors and system designs, rather than picking up whatever a long evolution has left at the doorstep. Renesas did this designing their RX architecture recently and it's pretty neat and clean. more —^
Wouldn't all of us as engineers, knowing what we know now, love to start with a clean sheet of paper and lay out a new processor architecture that can comprehend all the needs of control, integer, floating point, SIMD, graphics, video, networking, signal processing, etc. in one grand architecture, blended nicely with current memory structures and even considering manufacturing process technology, without the baggage of backwards compatibility?
And somebody show me where China has been enthusiastic about embracing or paying for outside IP. They're looking for a showcase, their own architecture, and this sounds like it. (Don't you remember the Olympics?)
Now, we also all know how extremely difficult the task ahead would be to be successful
(and "extremely" isn't a big enough word for it), but did I mention centralized government,
control, and massive manpower? China is a huge country with a huge self-
Or maybe they'll try to twist an existing architecture for their own purposes, but
other than left-
Me, I'm a huge fan of the open market, free choice, and competition. But China is its own world.
-